(no subject)
May. 27th, 2009 10:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Someone explain to me how this does not completely screw people over? Preferably someone fluent in legalese-to-English. Mostly relating to "there is little if any chance that a defendant will be badgered into waiving his right to have counsel present during interrogation" that part.
*needs a Patrick Jane or Patrick Bateman or someone demands an explanation for this bullshit icon*
*needs a Patrick Jane or Patrick Bateman or someone demands an explanation for this bullshit icon*