Jaguar (
kittydesade) wrote2009-05-27 10:49 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Someone explain to me how this does not completely screw people over? Preferably someone fluent in legalese-to-English. Mostly relating to "there is little if any chance that a defendant will be badgered into waiving his right to have counsel present during interrogation" that part.
*needs a Patrick Jane or Patrick Bateman or someone demands an explanation for this bullshit icon*
*needs a Patrick Jane or Patrick Bateman or someone demands an explanation for this bullshit icon*