kittydesade: (sorely fucking tested)
Jaguar ([personal profile] kittydesade) wrote2009-05-27 10:49 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Someone explain to me how this does not completely screw people over? Preferably someone fluent in legalese-to-English. Mostly relating to "there is little if any chance that a defendant will be badgered into waiving his right to have counsel present during interrogation" that part.

*needs a Patrick Jane or Patrick Bateman or someone demands an explanation for this bullshit icon*